I would like to cordially wish a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you and yours. Thank you for being the wonderful audience that you are. Merry Christmas and may God Bless.

Read the rest of this entry »

The Constitution could not be any more clear when it comes to the separation of Church and State:

There is no provision in the constitution requiring the total separation of church and state.

Despite this fact, cities and towns across the country seem to believe it is there duty to prevent any potentially religious objects from finding there way into public ‘holiday’ displays. Most of the time they seem to take the ax (pun intended) to Christmas trees and manger scenes. This year, however, the fight seems to be going another direction entirely.

News:

Views:

Needless to say, I find the whole thing entirely retarded. I am a Christian, but I respect the Jewish people and their religion a great deal. In a world where we usually hear about people fighting for Christmas trees and manger scenes, it is almost a bit refreshing to see that other groups sometimes have to go through the same hoops. Not that such a situation makes it any better, but it demonstrates a level of ‘equality’ that often seems to be missing.

Getting back on topic, there is no reason - so far as I can tell - to deny permission for a private religious group to erect a temporary holiday symbol on the same public property that is shared by other, more secular symbols (such as ‘holiday trees’). If anything, I would view the city’s decision as limiting the rights of freedom and expression and of religion of those being denied the permission.

By no means would allowing a religious holiday symbol in the display constitute a government ‘endorsement’ of religion. In fact, by allowing various holiday symbols they would be showcasing the diversity that most places seem to flaunt endlessly. It is the threats from the ambulance-chasers of religion - your friends at the ACLU - that are responsible for a great deal of this. On that notion, I encourage everyone to check out an organization actually defending your rights to practice and share your religion and related holidays - the Alliance Defense Fund and their special Christmas Page.

I also applaud Senator Allard on his support of the effort and scheduled attendance at the lighting ceremony - it is people like him that will lead the fight against those who want to trample over our traditional values and implement nonsense levels of diversity and sensitivity. I also encourage all people in Fort Collins who are religious - regardless of your denomination - to join in the lighting ceremony to show your support.

When it really comes down to it, I feel that the whole problem can be solved with two simple changes:

1. Allow the Menorah to be built
2. Pass a law requiring future symbols to be granted permission unless a valid reason can be found not to.

Common Sense:

Holidays are meant to be celebrated and enjoyed. If a group wants to construct a temporary religious symbol on public property (as long as it is reasonable, legal, and non-damaging - no sacrifice pits or things of that nature) they should be allowed to. It does not represent a government endorsement of religion and helps to encourage diversity in the community. It would truly be a win-win situation.